Importance of Steam Accumulator in Boilers

Steam Boilers are generally designed for a certain capacity at which they could supply steam continuously which is also its maximum continuous rating. So, the steam boiler designed for higher steam requirements can be made to run on lower loads or lower steam demands but a boiler designed for lower loads cannot run on higher loads or higher steam demands.

Generally it is observed that the steam requirement in a process is not fixed and keeps changing with time. For some time period there might be lower load requirements than the steam boiler capacity while for some period of time there might be high load requirements. Low load requirements can be easily met by the boiler but high steam requirements cannot be met by this boiler as it is not designed for such capacity. This is where a steam accumulator plays an important role as they store steam generated by the boiler and use it as and when required.

Steam Accumulators are designed in such a way that when there is an excess of steam, that when lower loads are required than the boiler maximum load, the excess steam gets stored in an accumulator and when the process steam load requirement increases, the steam from both the boiler and the accumulator can be released to meet up the process requirement.

Installing steam accumulator would bring about a huge reduction in boiler size, thereby reducing the cost of a boiler, installation cost, operating cost and increased boiler efficiencies.

Steam Accumulator would be a sensible and cost effective solution if,
Plant already having a boiler of a certain capacity but for some reasons the process load requirement increases for certain time period in a day while for other time, process load requirement falls even below the maximum capacity.
Plant planning to install a boiler for their process must consider the average heat load requirement of their process for deciding the maximum boiler capacity, and for the overload conditions steam accumulator can be installed.
Deciding the capacity of steam accumulator is not an easy task as it requires full time monitoring the steam flow rates in a process and making an organized chart showing the excess steam generation and overload steam demand. This data is collected for at least 2 to 3 days and any other load variations are recorded. Then this data helps in calculating the maximum capacity of a Steam Accumulator.

Avoiding the Pitfalls of Salesforce Implementation

Salesforce is one of the fastest growing software program businesses within the global. At Dreamforce 2015 it changed into known as the fourth largest software program employer and now with its partnership with Microsoft, that role can most effective improve. And yet, there are various businesses no longer reaping the advantages of this very adaptable and complete platform. As a substitute, it’s miles both poorly followed or adopted by using only a few members of a company, and the massive query is why? Why are we seeing such a lot of groups having to re-boot their implementation or feeling they’re not getting the value they have paid for?

I consider there are numerous, identifiable motives which can prevent companies from getting the total go back on their funding and, those motives begin at the strategy planning stage before the first instance is bought.

Reason1: No lengthy-time period approach

No person would expect some other CRM to provide complete go back on funding (ROI) inside the first yr or, however, that is what Salesforce is asked to do; rather than a 2 to 3-year integration and ROI method, it’s far predicted that 6 to 10 months ought to suffice. Part of that is because of how Salesforce is marketed; it’d seem that it’s miles like a cell telephone or pill and you could simply visit the app store and snatch what you want. But, not like a cellular smartphone or pill it requires records from current systems and a dedication to change behaviors to achieve the rewards. Sadly many executives buy into the cellular phone analogy without know-how the time and behavioral changes required. Whilst you then add changing enterprise priorities and a need for IT agility to the mixture you enjoy Motive #2.

Cause 2: Unrealistic Expectancies

Some distance too frequently I’ve visible Salesforce introduced in as a brief option to a current trouble, with a nebulous hope for large adoption inside the destiny. This could appear Whilst an Income chief sees problems with monitoring and reporting on Income hobby. Obviously, an answer named Salesforce ought to be the solution and in reality it can be the start of the answer, however, it can not be the only solution. The hassle is that for Salesforce to really launch its power it Has to be incorporated into any legacy systems in a Patron centered way, and that requires a miles longer-time period method. Which ends up in Cause #three.

Some distance too frequently I’ve visible salesforce introduced in as the brief option to a current trouble, with a nebulous hope for large adoption inside the destiny. This could appear whilst an income chief sees problems with monitoring and reporting on income hobby.

Case 3: Low platform adoption

Salesforce’s power is in aggregating information and offering it to the right patron (internal or outside) on the right time. But, that facts should be in, or handy to, the platform inside the first area and that requires a few major changes within the way people do their jobs. If there is no clear gain for changing behavior or, if it’s far seen as including to the workload, the implementation will stumble as humans use workarounds to do their day to day jobs, leading to Cause #4.

Case #4: Lack of accurate statistics

Whilst people don’t believe the information they are the usage of, or if they consider they personal and need to no longer percentage the records, they start squirreling it away on their nearby drives. Add customers that feel they’re no longer a part of this solution or platform so that they fight to preserve records in their device ensuing in the double entry of information, much less accurate records, lacking facts and/or facts duplication; making sure that the device simply isn’t presenting the benefits anticipated.

How then are we able to avoid these pitfalls this for a clean launch, or re-release, of Salesforce

First, we need to understand that Salesforce will transform the agency. Salesforce is not a fixed it and neglect it answer and it calls for dedication and buy-in at the best degrees of the employer. At most of the Salesforce activities, I have attended there was an overbalance of builders, admins and cease-customers and a Loss of Executives.

In lots of businesses, builders are visible as implementing new era from IT, Admins are often from distinctive chains of command so that they can not compel compliance and give up customers aren’t in a position to become aware of benefits for other regions of the company. Therefore, we have the those who can position the era in the vicinity, however, nobody who can get human beings to alternate their behavior then, and adopt it and, the shortage of its adoption is visible as a failure of implementation.

The exchange required is profound. For lots CRM’s the govt may be shown the large photo, make some decisions and sit again and wait for the switch to be tossed in or three years, in some cases, there’s a new govt sponsor by the time it’s live.

For Salesforce; executives, and stakeholders from ALL regions of the employer ought to have hands on participation from strategic making plans, through to implementation, schooling, and adoption. This will offer a based growth with room for agility to deal with business adjustments. All stakeholders have to be committed to being a part of the build, they ought to buy into, the long-term approach; have realistic expectations.

Executives need to be devoted to, and involved in, modeling the behavior they expect to peer. most vital there should be a clear vision with milestones for training, adoption, integration to other systems, enlargement to different departments and clean, agreed on and communicated priorities.

Understanding the Real Estate Agent’s Commission for NELA Homebuyers

The process of purchasing a home, particularly for first-time homebuyers, is somewhat opaque. You sign a contract with a broker, who you might view as your shopping friend, and yet you are not obligated to pay them for anything. At no point in the process do you cut a check to your real estate agent, even if they spend dozens of hours with you in the home purchasing process.

Let’s face it, it isn’t difficult for an agent to spend a dozen hours with a client. It can take a half a day to look at various homes for sale in Glendale, for instance. Logging another several hours looking at nearby homes in Glassell Park or Burbank makes sense.

This is no different in Northeast Los Angeles (NELA) as it is in Bel Air or San Francisco or Chicago or New York. In the American system of house buying, the actual compensation to both agents, those representing buyers and sellers, is somewhere between 5% and 8% of the sale price of the home. It is paid for by the seller and split 50-50 between the agents, typically (although that occasionally gets negotiated differently between them).

So, for example, if you buy a home in Eagle Rock for $650,000 the commission might be 6%. The seller then pays out $39,000 to the brokers, who then each get (give or take) $19,500 for their work. Nice, right? Keep in mind they might spend many hours in showing the home to a variety of buyers (weekdays, evenings and weekends), all while directing preparation of the home for sale, or showing a buyer 20 or 30 other properties after spending hours on research (in towns adjoining this one, such as Mt. Washington, Hermon, Glassell Park, Highland Park, Garvanza and others), negotiating prices, drawing up contracts and guiding buyers and sellers through the closing. Also, Realtors rent offices, employ administrative and marketing staff, and absorb the marketing expenses (photography, videography, signs, listings, even staging costs in some situations). Those brokers’ fees also may be split between agents who work for brokers. Brokers are well compensated, but not as much as is often mistakenly assumed.

The more successful agents know from their education and experience how to price a home fairly and effectively, how to work out issues in negotiations, and how to guide a buyer or seller through the paperwork, legal and financial/lender processes.

Also, sometimes a home doesn’t sell, a buyer doesn’t buy, and no one earns a commission. That’s the way it can work in real estate.

From time to time real estate agents try different methods of compensation. Alternatives to this system – each of which have clear disadvantages – could be:

Pay a flat fee – Say you determine it’s worth paying an agent $5,000 to help you find or sell a $750,000 house. But the other party has to agree to something similar and it’s highly unlikely they would do that. In cases where someone is purchasing a home from a family member or friend this might be a workable plan. Or not.

Pay a [lower] fee that offers no incentive to move quickly – This falls under the rule that “you get what you pay for.” If an agent is working to earn 1% on the sale price, will they be sufficiently incentivized to give a buyer or seller expeditious service? When the fee is at a market rate, the agents are collectively interested in making the sale happen as quickly as possible.

Pay by the hour – If a buyer’s agent agrees to this, presumably the difference between the hourly fee and what would be the 3% (more or less) of the buyer’s agent would be value returned to the buyer. But that would incentivize an inefficient process, such as seeing too many homes that are inappropriate or, for the seller, bringing in too many prospects who aren’t really qualified buyers.

For more on homes available in NELA, speak with a realtor. Experienced NELA realtors are able to outline the terms of working with them under traditional fee structures.